| |
 |
Why did the text AIRMET need to be standardized? |
| |
| |
|
There are three main reasons:
1) to remove ambiguity (more on that later);
2) to make the text more compliant with
international standards, and;
3) to allow computer software to create a text
AIRMET from and be consistent with
AIRMET graphics
drawn by AWC’s forecasters.
|
| |
 |
We’ve been using text AIRMETs for years. Why should
we care about using a graphical AIRMET? |
| |
| |
|
Actually, aviation weather users have been asking for
weather graphics for years. The text AIRMET requires meteorologists to
describe hazards over large geographical areas spread over six-hour
periods. The graphical AIRMET, or G-AIRMET, promises to provide a
decision-making tool based on weather “snapshots” at
shorter time intervals. The G-AIRMET will be able to identify
hazardous weather in space and time more precisely than text, enabling
pilots to maintain higher safety margins while flying efficient
routes.
G-AIRMETs are a better way for aviation forecasters to show you their
forecast through interactive and easy to understand graphical
displays. Forecasters will put their energy into creating and updating
G-AIRMET depictions. Traditional text AIRMETs will still exist, but
will be standardized, derived from and consistent with G-AIRMET
information.
|
| |
 |
What do you mean by “ambiguity” in the text? |
| |
| |
|
Some of the terms used in the free-text form of the
AIRMET are ill-defined, and could mean different things to different
users. One of the goals of the standardization of the text is to have
the words mean the same thing to all users.
|
| |
 |
If you’re not using “OCNL” or
“FRQ” anymore, how do I know what the coverage is? |
| |
| |
|
According to the AIM (Aeronautical Information
Manual), AIRMETs “are issued for ‘widespread’
conditions.” Widespread is defined as affecting or expected to
affect an area of at least 3,000 square miles at any one time during
the forecast period.
|
| |
 |
What does it mean when you say “trend remarks will
no longer be included”? |
| |
| |
|
Statements involving movement of the hazard (i.e.
“CONDS SPRDG EWD”) and changes in intensity (i.e.
“INTSF” or “WKN”) will no longer be included.
|
| |
 |
Why are you not going to include the reason for amending,
cancelling, or updating the AIRMET? |
| |
| |
|
International standards prohibit the inclusion of
non-essential descriptive information.
|
| |
 |
Why are you removing the cause of turbulence, strong
surface winds, and low level wind shear potential? |
| |
| |
|
International standards prohibit the inclusion of
non-essential descriptive information.
|
| |
 |
Why are you removing the type of icing? |
| |
| |
|
The inclusion of icing-type can be misleading. FAA has
determined that no icing-type (rime ice, mixed, and glaze or clear)
can be excluded from consideration during operations in icing
conditions. Therefore, the FAA has stated that it unnecessary to cite
the type of icing.
|
| |
 |
Why are you removing the location of icing with respect to
clouds and precipitation in the ice AIRMET? |
| |
| |
|
Icing is assumed to occur when an aircraft is exposed
to visible moisture (clouds, fog or precipitation). International
standards prohibit the inclusion of non-essential descriptive
information.
|